PromenautGovernance
Agentic oversight
Governance and control: the oversight a regulated institution needs, built into the architecture rather than bolted on. Three things a security, risk or procurement reviewer actually evaluates.
Least-privilege access
Every agent and workflow is scoped to the minimum access it needs, granted deliberately and reviewable at any time.
- Each agent and workflow is granted the narrowest set of permissions required to do its job.
- Grants are explicit and deliberate, never inherited or assumed.
- Entitlements are reviewable, so access can be attested at any time.
Try it
4/4 rows at least privilege · 0 over · 0 under · click a cell to change
Blast radius stays small
A compromised or misbehaving agent can only reach what it was scoped to, never the whole estate.
Attestable entitlements
Access maps to a clear agent-by-permission grid your reviewers can inspect and sign off.
No standing over-permission
Grants are deliberate rather than inherited, so privilege does not quietly accumulate over time.
Governed at the workflow level
Policies, guardrails, input/output controls and mandatory approval gates attach to the workflow, not the model.
- Oversight sits on what agents actually do, every action, input and output, not on which model was used.
- Consequential steps pass through mandatory approval gates with human sign-off.
- Input/output controls, guardrails and policy travel with the workflow, so control survives a model swap.
Try it
↑ swap it - the controls below stay the same
Pick a request and run it.
The unit of control is the work
Governing the workflow means the same rules apply whichever model runs underneath it.
Human accountability at the gate
Nothing consequential ships without a named person approving it, on the record.
Policy that outlives the model
Swap the model and the guardrails, gates and policy stay exactly where they were.
Tamper-evident audit trail
Every action is logged, attributable and exportable as evidence, provable after the fact.
- Every action is recorded with who or what did it, when, and what changed.
- Entries are chained so any later edit is detectable, not silently overwritten.
- The trail exports as evidence for internal audit, model risk and the regulator.
Try it
chain intact · every entry verifiable
Provable, not just logged
A chained record means you can show the trail was not altered after the event, not merely assert it.
Attributable to an actor
Each entry ties to a specific agent or person, so accountability is never ambiguous.
Evidence on demand
Export the trail for an audit or a review without reconstructing what happened from scattered tools.
See it on a workflow you own.
Bring a real process. We'll show what your first agentic workflow looks like on the platform.
