Use case · Investment decisions
Business Case Evaluation
Every portfolio cycle brings dozens of major investment cases, each hundreds of pages long. Senior analysts spend weeks reading and scoring them, and the results are inconsistent because they depend on who read it and how much time they had.
Promenaut scores each case across financial, strategic, architectural, risk and cultural lenses at once, stress-tests the assumptions, and returns a Proceed / Rework / Reject / Defer verdict with every conclusion cited - in minutes, for a human to sign off.
From a 200-page case to a cited verdict.
$ promenaut run business
Evaluated against a live $377M investment case
Extract and validate
Parse the investment case, pulling sponsors, costs, benefits, OKRs, assumptions and dependencies into a structured object. A 15-point quality check surfaces missing fields before scoring.
Score across five lenses
Five agents run at once - financial ROI, CEO and GCIO strategic alignment, architectural fit and cultural fit - each producing a score with cited evidence.
Stress-test the risk
A risk agent challenges the assumptions and dependencies, then a verdict agent weighs every lens into a Proceed / Rework / Reject / Defer call with its reasoning.
Hand it to a human
The structured verdict goes to a reviewer before any committee sees it. Every claim traces back to the source case or the knowledge graph.
What it produced.
Evaluated against a live $377M investment case
$377M
Investment case evaluated end to end.
Minutes
To score a case that took weeks by hand.
Five lenses
Financial, strategic, architectural, risk and cultural, all at once.
Cited verdict
Every conclusion traced to its source, with no black-box scoring.
As more cases are evaluated, portfolio-level analysis opens up - overlapping dependencies, strategic gaps, cases ranked by weighted score.
See it on a workflow you own.
Bring a real process. We'll show what your first agentic workflow looks like on the platform.
Promenaut
